LONDON: Heathrow Airport has unveiled three options for a new runway, saying each one would be “quicker and cheaper” than plans for a rival hub airport, the British Broadcasting Corporation reported on Wednesday.
The airport’s submission to the Davies Commission, which is looking at raising airport capacity, outlined a runway to the north, north-west or south-west of the existing airport.
It said a new runway could be in place by 2029, allowing 260,000 more flights.
London Mayor Boris Johnson said such an expansion would be “disastrous”.
According to Heathrow’s submission, building a new runway would deliver extra capacity at the airport by 2025-29 and would allow it to operate 740,000 flights a year — up from the current limit of 480,000.
The plans would “maintain the UK’s global hub status for the foreseeable future” and “protect the thriving businesses and plentiful jobs that surround Heathrow,” it said.
Heathrow’s preferred option would be to place a new runway to the north-west or the south-west of the airport.
This would “deliver a full-length third runway while minimising the impact on the local community.”
The submission also detailed how a new westerly runway would help reduce noise pollution because planes would not have to fly so low over London.
It predicted that, even with a third runway, there would be 10-20per cent fewer people affected by noise under its new plans.
The option of building north of the airport would be the quickest and cheapest, the airport acknowledged — but it would also be the nosiest and have the biggest impact on residential property.
Each of the options would mean the compulsory purchase of some properties and some property demolitions, as well as potentially major work on the M25.
The submission also outlined the need for a sixth terminal at Heathrow as part of the plans — which would enable the airport to handle 130m passengers a year, rather than the current figure of 70m.
Heathrow chief executive, Colin Matthews, said, “After half a century of vigorous debate but little action, it is clear the UK desperately needs a single hub airport with the capacity to provide the links to emerging economies which can boost UK jobs, GDP and trade.
“It is clear that the best solution for taxpayers, passengers and business is to build on the strength we already have at Heathrow.”
He continued, “Today we are showing how that vision can be achieved while keeping the impact on local residents to an absolute minimum.”
Matthews said he had not ruled out a fourth runway at Heathrow, but said this would not be needed until at least 2040.
However, Johnson said the proposals for a new runway at Heathrow “were politically, environmentally and socially unacceptable”.
“There will be more pigs flying than aircraft if we are to believe the claim that three runways at Heathrow will make less noise than two,” he said.
Johnson added the move “would be a disastrous outcome for Londoners, nor would it solve our aviation capacity crisis as a fourth runway would need to be in the planning process before a third was even open”.
On Monday, the mayor published proposals for three possible replacement hubs – an artificial island in the Thames Estuary dubbed “Boris Island”, a major expansion at Stansted, or an airport at the Isle of Grain in north Kent.
All airports must submit their plans to the commission by 19 July.
Meanwhile, David Learmount, of aviation experts Flightglobal, said expanding Heathrow was the “most disastrous” option in terms of air pollution and noise, but was the best short-term solution.
He said better long-term options were large hub airports at Gatwick or Stansted, while the Thames Estuary plan could also work but would “take ages” to build.
